Journal: Journal of Virology
Article Title: Establishment of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-based reporter for picornaviral 3C proteases
doi: 10.1128/jvi.01936-25
Figure Lengend Snippet: The flipGFP-based reporter system could be optimized for high-throughput screening of compounds targeting 3C protease. ( A ) Schematic representation of the flipGFP-based reporter system optimized for 96-well format. The fluorescence signal from flipGFP was quantified by the plate reader (GloMax Discover System, Promega). The inhibitory efficacy of each compound was calculated using the indicated formula. ( B ) HEK293T cells co-transfected with the expression vector of flipGFP (3B/3C) or flipGFP (VP2/VP3) and 3C protease were treated with rupintrivir. The inhibitory efficacy of the compound was calculated 24 h post-transfection using the detected fluorescent intensity. The cell viability of the HEK293T cells treated with the rupintrivir for 24 h was determined by CellTiter-Glo (Promega). ( C ) RD-S cells were infected with EV-A71-mGL at an MOI of 1.0, treated with rupintrivir, and incubated for 24 h at 33°C. The inhibitory efficacy of the compound was calculated using the detected fluorescent intensity. ( D ) HEK293T cells were treated with DC07090, GC376, Ebselen, Ensitrelvir, Luteoloside, Nimatrelvir, or Camostat Mesilate for 24 h, and cell viability was determined by CellTiter-Glo (Promega). ( E ) HEK293T cells transfected with the expression vector of 3C protease and flipGFP (3B/3C) were treated with DC07090, GC376, Ebselen, Ensitrelvir, Luteoloside, Nimatrelvir, or Camostat Mesilate at concentrations of 3, 10, or 30 µM. The inhibitory efficacy of the compound was calculated using the detected fluorescent intensity. ( F ) RD-S cells were infected with EV-A71-mGL at an MOI of 1.0, treated with DC07090, GC376, Ebselen, or Ensitrelvir at concentrations of 3, 10, or 30 µM, and incubated for 24 h at 33°C. The inhibitory efficacy of the compound was calculated using the detected fluorescent intensity. ( G ) RD-S cells were infected with EV-A71-mGL at an MOI of 1.0, treated with Ebselen at concentrations of 30 µM, and incubated for 24 h at 33°C. The fluorescence signals were monitored using fluorescence microscopy. ( H ) HEK293T cells stably expressing SCARB2 were infected with EV-A71-mGL at an MOI of 1.0, treated with Ebselen at concentrations of 3, 10, or 30 µM, and incubated for 24 h at 33°C. The inhibitory efficacy of the compound was calculated using the detected fluorescent intensity. ( I ) HEK293T cells co-transfected with the expression vector of flipGFP (3B/3C) and 3C protease were treated with Ebselen. The inhibitory efficacy of the compound was calculated 24 h post-transfection using the detected fluorescent intensity. The cell viability of the HEK293T cells treated with Ebselen for 24 h was determined by CellTiter-Glo (Promega). ( J ) RD-S cells were infected with EV-A71-mGL at an MOI of 1.0, treated with Ebselen, and incubated for 24 h at 33°C. The inhibitory efficacy of the compound was calculated using the detected fluorescent intensity. ( K ) RD-S cells were infected with EV-A71 (strain SK-EV006) at an MOI of 0.1, treated with Ebselen at concentrations of 30 µM, and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Infectious titers in the culture supernatants were determined using a plaque-forming assay (left). RD-S cells were infected with EV-A71 (strain SK-EV006) at an MOI of 0.001, treated with Ebselen at concentrations of 30 µM, and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Infectious titers in the culture supernatants were determined using a plaque-forming assay (right). ( L ) RD-A cells were infected with EV-D68 (strain Fermon) at an MOI of 0.1, treated with Ebselen at concentrations of 30 µM, and incubated for 48 h at 33°C. Infectious titers in the culture supernatants were determined using a plaque-forming assay (left). RD-A cells were infected with EV-D68 (US/IL/14-18952) at an MOI of 0.1, treated with Ebselen at concentrations of 30 µM, and incubated for 24 h at 33°C. Infectious titers in the culture supernatants were determined using a plaque-forming assay (right). Data in panels B to J are representative of two independent experiments; data presented in panels K and L are mean ± S.D. of two independent experiments. For the experiment presented in K and L, significance was determined using Student’s t -test ( n = 4) (* P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01; **** P ≤ 0.0001).
Article Snippet: The following antibodies and reagents were used in this study: Enterovirus 71 VP1 antibody (GT185) (GTX633390; GeneTex), Enterovirus 71 2C antibody (GTX132354; GeneTex), Enterovirus 71 3C antibody (GTX132357; GeneTex), Enterovirus 71 3CD antibody (GTX132355; GeneTex), anti-FLAG M2-Peroxidase (HRP) monoclonal antibody produced in mouse (A8592; Merck), Anti-Strep-tag II mAb (M211-3; MBL), Anti-DDDDK-tag mAb-Alexa Fluor 594 (M185-A59, MBL), anti-β-Actin monoclonal antibody produced in mouse (A2228; Merck), Peroxidase AffiniPure Goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (115-035-003; Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, Inc.), Peroxidase AffiniPure Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (111-035-003; Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, Inc.), Rupintrivir ( T16809 ; TargetMol), DC07090 dihydrochloride (HY-123517; MedChemExpress), GC376 (S0475; Selleck Chemicals), Ebselen (E0946; TOKYO CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.), Ensitrelvir (HY-143216; MedChemExpress), Luteoloside (S9018; Selleck Chemicals), Nirmatrelvir (HY-138687; MedChemExpress), and Camostat Mesilate (HY-13512; MedChemExpress).
Techniques: High Throughput Screening Assay, Fluorescence, Transfection, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Infection, Incubation, Microscopy, Stable Transfection